Joyce Karam
Rarely has there been as much at stake as during the U.S.  presidential trip to Saudi Arabia. But in the midst of regional  turbulence, shaken trust and broken communication, President Barack  Obama will have his plate full while convening with King Abdullah Bin  Abdulaziz this week, in a conversation that will certainly shape the  course of events in the Middle East over the next two years.
Unlike  2009’s “hastily arranged and badly prepared” visit as Kim Ghattas  describes in her book “The Secretary,” months of planning and prior  consultations have gone into this trip. In 2009, a young and a less  experienced Obama presented his host with a laundry list of requests  that Washington would like Riyadh to meet on the issue of normalizing  relations with Israel. The king’s response baffled the new president.  According to Ghattas, he told Obama: “Whoever advised you to ask me this  wants to destroy the Saudi-American relationship.”
Assurances and communication
Five  years since that first meeting, a more realistic Obama, and a  completely different set of policy priorities from Egypt to Syria to  Gulf Security and counterterrorism will dominate the Riyadh summit.  Neither Saudi nor the United States can afford a botched visit. Its  success is crucial in restoring balance to the Middle East, and global  security, while its failure will only increase the wave of regional  instability.
The visit’s success will hinge on Obama’s ability to assure the Saudi leadership regarding U.S. commitment to Gulf security
Joyce Karam
The visit’s success will hinge on Obama’s ability to assure the  Saudi leadership regarding U.S. commitment to Gulf security and the  seven-decade-old alliance between Riyadh and Washington. Lack of open  and candid communication in the last two years, over the issue of  Iranian nuclear talks, have contributed a great deal to the distrust  between the two capitals. Riyadh was not notified about the secret back  channel talks that Washington held with Iran through Oman, nor was it  given a heads up about Obama’s historic call with Iranian President  Hassan Rowhani on Sept. 28. The Saudi leadership is not against an  Iranian-U.S. rapprochement and has a long positive history with Rowhani,  but is rather concerned about what it sees as Iran’s hegemonic  ambitions and meddling in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen and Bahrain.
A  poor communication channel between Saudi Arabia and the United States  will backfire on the mutual interest of the two countries. When Riyadh  interprets U.S. actions as blindsiding the kingdom, it will look into  other alternatives. It is no coincidence that Saudi Arabia decided to  award France (and not the U.S.) the $3 billion contract to support the  Lebanese Army last December, and has entered key discussions with Russia  into supporting the Egyptian army if parts of U.S. aid continue to be  withheld. Assuring the kingdom and keeping Saudi Arabia in the loop when  it comes to Iranian nuclear talks is the least that Obama can offer in  his meeting this week.
Meeting half-way on Syria and Egypt
In  the last few months, there are increasingly more indications in  Washington that the Obama administration has taken measures to meet  Saudi Arabia half way on the conflict in Syria and the transition in  Egypt.
On Syria, Washington is showing more readiness to support  the moderate rebels fighting the Assad regime. Daniel Rubinstein, the  new U.S. envoy to Syria, told me in an interview with al-Hayat last week  that “unifying and strengthening the moderate opposition” will be a  priority in the next few months. Saudi Arabia and the United States are  pursuing new options in Syria, and have common interest in a more robust  counterterrorism effort and changing the calculus of both Assad and  Russia’s Putin. The visit of Interior Minister Mohammad Bin Nayef to  Washington last month and the ongoing consultations with him are  critical to U.S. efforts in Syria and to regional stability at large.
Egypt’s  stability is a cornerstone of Saudi Arabia’s regional strategy and  there are key differences with the U.S. on democratic principles and the  role of the Muslim Brotherhood. Riyadh has recently designated the  movement as a “terrorist organization” while Washington sees engaging it  as a critical part of any successful transition. It is unlikely that  the Obama visit will change those views, but the two leaders can agree  on fostering Egypt’s stability and sustaining the defense aid to the  country.
When Obama first came to office, a very senior Saudi  official told me that he is “a gift from God,” that would help repair  the U.S. image in the region and fix American-Islamic relations after  the George W. Bush Presidency. The sense of disappointment in the  relationship can be overcome with more engaging and pro-active policies  that emphasize regional stability, non-nuclear proliferation and  emboldening the moderates. 
____________________
Joyce  Karam is the Washington Correspondent for Al-Hayat Newspaper, an  International Arabic Daily based in London. She has covered American  politics extensively since 2004 with focus on U.S. policy towards the  Middle East. Prior to that, she worked as a Journalist in Lebanon,  covering the Post-war situation. Joyce holds a B.A. in Journalism and an  M.A. in International Peace and Conflict Resolution. Twitter:  @Joyce_Karam
 
No comments:
Post a Comment